Immunotherapy / PD-1 inhibitorFDA-approvedSecond-line

Nivolumab

How it works

Nivolumab is an antibody that blocks the PD-1 receptor on immune cells, allowing them to attack cancer cells.

Cancer types

Lung Cancer— All patients
Colorectal Cancer— All patients
Pancreatic Cancer— All patients
Ovarian Cancer— All patients
Leukemia— All patients

Efficacy

Studies show that nivolumab can improve overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer, with a median overall survival of approximately 8.5 months.

Side effects

Mild

Most people tolerate this treatment well. Side effects are generally manageable and do not require stopping treatment.

Evidence from research

StudyCancer typeStageEfficacy
Nivolumab Improves Survival in Lung Cancer PatientsLung Cancerphase-3Event-free survival seemed to be prolonged with nivolumab (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.83) in patients with single or co-alterations in any of the KEAP1, STK11, CDKN2A and/or SMARCA4 driver genes.Source →
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment shows promise for Japanese patients with lung cancerLung Cancerphase-3Median overall survival was 41.0 months versus 15.2 months, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 38% versus 16%.Source →
Testing a Special Diet with Immunotherapy in Melanoma PatientsMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Testing a Combination of Bexmarilimab and Nivolumab in CancerLung Cancerphase-1—Source →
Testing a Combination of Vaccines and Immunotherapy for Advanced Lung and Head and Neck CancersLung Cancerphase-1—Source →
Diabetes May Increase Side Effects of Cancer TreatmentLung CancerobservationalNivolumab demonstrated similar antitumor activity in both groups, with no significant differences in median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), or objective response rates.Source →
Testing a New Vaccine and Medicine for Liver Cancer and MetastasesColorectal Cancerphase-2—Source →
Combination Therapy Tested in Colorectal CancerColorectal Cancerphase-1/2The median progression-free survival was 1.7 months in patients with PIK3CA wild-type tumors and 1.6 months in patients with PIK3CA-mutant tumors.Source →
Study Examines Combination Therapy for Advanced Prostate CancerProstate Cancerphase-2The confirmed PSA response rate was 21.6% in one group, and 20.5% in the other.Source →
Testing a New Vaccine and Immunotherapy Combination for Colorectal and Pancreatic CancerColorectal Cancerphase-1—Source →
Testing Combination Therapy for Advanced Prostate CancerProstate Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing Immunotherapy for Localized MelanomaMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Testing a New Combination Therapy for Advanced Colorectal CancerColorectal Cancerphase-1—Source →
Rare Side Effect of Cancer Treatment Leads to Fatal Heart AttackMelanomaobservational—Source →
Combining two cancer treatments may improve outcomes for some patientsLung Cancerphase-1/2Objective response rates were 18.2% for non-small-cell lung cancer, 18.5% for urothelial carcinoma, and 14.3% for hepatocellular carcinoma.Source →
Immunotherapy Options for Colorectal CancerColorectal CancerreviewPembrolizumab has a well-characterized long-term safety profile and superior progression-free and overall survival versus chemotherapy.Source →
Combining Cancer Treatments Boosts Immune Response in Brain MetastasesLung Cancerlab-study—Source →
Evaluating Safety of Combination Therapy for Advanced Pancreatic CancerPancreatic Cancerphase-1—Source →
Combining Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-2The objective response rate was 7% and 10% at 6 and 12 weeks, and reached 29% as the best response.Source →
Testing Radiation Therapy with or without Nivolumab for Early or Recurring Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing Focused Ultrasound to Open Blood-Brain Barrier for Lung Cancer Brain MetastasesLung Cancerphase-3—Source →
New Prognostic Tool for Lung Cancer Patients on NivolumabLung CancerobservationalPatients with a CHAM score ≥ 4 had median survival times of 6.7 and 18.7 months, respectively.Source →
Comparing Blinatumomab Alone to Blinatumomab with Nivolumab in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaLeukemiaphase-2—Source →
Combining Immunotherapy and Radiation for Colorectal and Pancreatic CancerColorectal Cancerphase-2—Source →
Fecal Microbiota Transplant and Anti-PD-1 Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal CancerColorectal Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing Combination Therapy for Richter's TransformationLeukemiaphase-2—Source →
Comparing Nivolumab Administration at Home vs. in a ClinicColorectal Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing a New Treatment Combination for Advanced Pancreatic CancerPancreatic Cancerphase-2—Source →
Study of Nivolumab and Relatlimab in Untreated MelanomaMelanomaphase-3—Source →
Melanoma Treatment Trial Investigates New Combination TherapyMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Treating Advanced Melanoma with Combination TherapiesMelanomaphase-3—Source →
New Test for Lung Cancer Patients May Predict Treatment ResponseLung Cancerlab-studyThe area under the curve for miR-3613-5p improved from 0.837 to 0.897, and the hazard ratio increased from 3.386 to 7.815.Source →
Genetic Factors May Influence Antibody Response to Cancer TreatmentMelanomalab-study—Source →
Testing Nivolumab and Ramucirumab for Advanced Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Comparing Treatments for Advanced Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-3—Source →
Testing Nivolumab and Chemotherapy for Early Stage Lung Cancer in ChinaLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Taiwanese Study Examines Nivolumab and Chemotherapy for Lung CancerLung Cancerpreclinical—Source →
Testing Nivolumab and Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases from Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-1—Source →
Testing Combination Therapy for Melanoma Brain MetastasesMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Testing a Combination Treatment for Metastatic MelanomaMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Testing Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Advanced Squamous Cell Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-3—Source →
Testing Nivolumab and Relatlimab for Melanoma Brain MetastasesMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Study of Immunotherapy for High-Risk MelanomaMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Testing a Combination Treatment for Pancreatic and Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing New Treatments for Relapsed or Refractory LeukemiaLeukemiaphase-1—Source →
Testing Nivolumab and Hydroxychloroquine for Advanced MelanomaMelanomaphase-1—Source →
Stopping Combo Immunotherapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases May Be SafeMelanomaobservational4-year OS exceeded 83% in patients discontinuing COMBO after CR, PR, or toxicity following CR, compared with 66.4% in those discontinuing due to toxicity after PR.Source →
Pancreatic Cancer Vaccine Trial Evaluates Personalized TreatmentPancreatic Cancerphase-1—Source →
Evaluating Adaptive Dosing of Immunotherapy for Metastatic MelanomaMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Combination Therapy for Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic CancerPancreatic Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing a New Treatment for Advanced MelanomaMelanomaphase-1—Source →
Testing Nivolumab for Leptomeningeal DiseaseLung Cancerphase-1—Source →
Testing Olanzapine with Nivolumab for Advanced Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Comparing Chemotherapy and Chemo-Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-3—Source →
Testing Immunotherapy with Chemotherapy for Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing New Treatments for Advanced Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing a New Approach to Treating Advanced MelanomaMelanomapreclinical—Source →
Testing Immunotherapy in Advanced Colorectal CancerColorectal Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing Nivolumab in Rare Solid TumorsBreast Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing Combination Therapy for Advanced Skin Cancers in Kidney Transplant RecipientsMelanomaphase-1—Source →
Melanoma Patient Responds to Repeated Treatment with Ipilimumab and NivolumabMelanomaobservational—Source →
New Combination Therapy Tested in Early-Stage Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-1/2The 36-month recurrence-free survival was 80%.Source →
Survival Outcomes After Stopping Nivolumab Due to Side Effects in Lung CancerLung CancerobservationalThe median overall survival was 35.73 months (95% CI: 30.06-41.40).Source →
Testing New Cancer Treatment in Combination with Existing MedicationsLung Cancerphase-1—Source →
Rare Sleep Disorder Linked to Cancer TreatmentMelanomaobservational—Source →
Rare Blood Disorder in Lung Cancer Patient Treated with NivolumabLung Cancerobservational—Source →
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Combination Shows Promise in Some Cancer PatientsColorectal Cancerphase-2The disease control rates for breast cancer and other solid tumors were 33% and 32%, respectively.Source →
Testing Defactinib, Avutometinib, and Nivolumab for Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Comparing Ways to Give Melanoma MedicationsMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Testing New Treatments for Advanced MelanomaMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Testing IL2 and Immunotherapy in Advanced Melanoma PatientsMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Testing Nivolumab with Standard Treatment for Colorectal Cancer with BRAF MutationColorectal Cancerphase-2—Source →
COVID-19 Vaccination May Improve Lung Cancer TreatmentLung CancerobservationalPatients receiving ≥2 mRNA doses had significantly longer PFS2 than those receiving 0-1 dose (14.0 vs. 9.6 months; p = 0.04).Source →
Melanoma Treatment Trial Investigates Combination of NeoVax and ImmunotherapiesMelanomaphase-1—Source →
Preventing Melanoma Recurrence with NivolumabMelanomaphase-3—Source →
Immunotherapy May Offer Better Survival for Lung Cancer Patients with Poor HealthLung Cancerphase-3Median overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab: 29-weeks (95% CI: 11.3-46.7) versus 8-weeks (95% CI: 3.5-12.5; p<0.001)Source →
Evaluating Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Combination with Chemotherapy for Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Evaluating Nivolumab and Docetaxel for Advanced Lung CancerLung Cancerpreclinical—Source →
Testing Combination Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer and Solid TumorsBreast Cancerphase-1—Source →
Preventing Mucosal Melanoma Return After SurgeryMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Testing New Treatments for Advanced Melanoma That Has ProgressedMelanomaphase-3—Source →
Testing a New Combination Treatment for Advanced Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Low-dose nivolumab shows promise in treating lung cancerLung Cancerphase-2The estimated 2-year event-free survival rate was 56.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.3%-73.9%), and the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 66.6% (95% CI: 56.4%-86.8%).Source →
Testing a New Treatment for Advanced Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-1—Source →
Testing Nivolumab and Ipilimumab with Radiation in Advanced Rectal CancerColorectal Cancerphase-2—Source →
Testing Nivolumab to Prevent Leukemia RelapseLeukemiaphase-2—Source →
Testing Immunotherapy After Surgery for High-Risk MelanomaMelanomaphase-3—Source →
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab TrialLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Trial Tests Cancer Drugs in HIV PatientsBreast Cancerphase-1—Source →
Testing Tocilizumab with Immunotherapy for Advanced MelanomaMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Immunotherapy Shows Promise for Rare Ovarian and Cervical CancersLeukemiaphase-2The overall response rate was 9.38%, with two complete responses that are ongoing at >3 years and one partial response.Source →
Nivolumab's Safety and Effectiveness in Chinese Lung Cancer PatientsLung CancerobservationalThe median overall survival was 21.2 months.Source →
B cells and genetic changes may predict response to cancer treatmentOvarian Cancerphase-2More than two passenger fusion genes were detected in six of the seven responders, whereas eight of the ten non-responders lacked fusion genes.Source →
GRIm Score Predicts Response to Melanoma TreatmentMelanomaobservationalPatients with a low GRIm Score had significantly longer median progression-free survival (21.4 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.003) and overall survival (26.5 vs. 7.2 months, p < 0.001).Source →
Combining Immunotherapy for Advanced Anal CancerColorectal Cancerphase-2The median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for nivolumab and 3.7 months for nivolumab plus ipilimumab.Source →
Fatal Lung Disease after Lung Cancer TreatmentLung Cancerobservational—Source →
New Biomarker Predicts Outcomes for Lung Cancer Patients on NivolumabLung CancerobservationalPatients with GLR <70.76 achieved significantly longer OS (median 24.1 vs 9.6 months; p < 0.001) and PFS (9.7 vs 5.8 months; p < 0.001) compared with those with GLR ≥70.76.Source →
Immunotherapy Response Predicted by Low Tumor Mutation Burden and PD-L1 ExpressionMelanomaobservational—Source →
Long-term remission in lung cancer patient treated with nivolumabLung CancerobservationalThe patient remained in continuous remission with a progression-free survival exceeding 82 months and an overall survival exceeding 84 months.Source →
Combining TM5614 and Nivolumab to Treat Advanced MelanomaMelanomaphase-3—Source →
Rare Side Effect of Cancer Treatment in Older PatientMelanomaobservational—Source →
Combination Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma Shows Promise in Real-World StudyMelanomaobservationalThe response rate was 54% (39/72) and, after 13.6 months of median follow-up, a longer median progression-free survival [17.03 months (95% CI 4.8-18.6)].Source →
Blood Transfusions May Affect Lung Cancer Treatment OutcomesLung CancerobservationalMedian progression-free survival was 5.93 months, and median overall survival was 8.23 months.Source →
Combination Cancer Therapy Linked to Kidney and Pancreas DamageLung Cancerobservational—Source →
Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Treatment QuestionedLung Cancerphase-3Nivolumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy yielded an additional 0.90 QALYs with the marginal cost of $231,948.33.Source →
New Study Explores Using Nivolumab to Treat Malignant AscitesPancreatic Cancerphase-2Seven patients (77.8%) showed a clinical response.Source →
Melanoma Study Examines Vaccine Combination with ImmunotherapyMelanomaphase-2Objective response rates were 59.7% and 59.2% in the two treatment arms.Source →
Combining Nivolumab with Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian CancerOvarian Cancerphase-2Fifteen of the 20 evaluable patients had complete gross resection at ICS, and 7 of 20 achieved an optimal pathologic chemotherapy response score of 3.Source →
Immune therapy may trigger severe colitis in some patientsMelanomaobservational—Source →
Combination Treatment Shows Promise for Rare Gynecological CancersOvarian Cancerphase-2The overall objective response rate was 54% (95% CI, 35-71), with 3 (12%) complete responses and 12 (42%) partial responses.Source →
Study Examines Combination Therapy for Advanced Liver CancerColorectal Cancerphase-2—Source →
Cost-effectiveness of dual immunotherapy for lung cancerLung Cancerphase-3Nivolumab plus ipilimumab provided an incremental gain of 1.11 and 0.96 QALYs over chemotherapy in the USA and China, respectively.Source →
Comparing Two Ways to Give Cancer TreatmentMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Long-term Survival and Response to Immunotherapy in Melanoma PatientsMelanomaphase-2At 4 years from the start of treatment, 80% of patients remained event-free, including 95% of patients who achieved a major pathologic response.Source →
Combining RP1 and Nivolumab May Help Some Melanoma PatientsMelanomaphase-2The confirmed objective response rate was 32.9% (95% CI, 25.2% to 41.3%; 15.0% complete response).Source →
TIL Therapy for Melanoma Patients May Benefit from IFNα SupportMelanomaphase-2Disease control was obtained in 11.1% of the patients treated without IFNα and in 41.7% of the patients treated with IFNα.Source →
Rare Side Effect of Cancer Treatment: Tongue DiscolorationOvarian Cancerobservational—Source →
Combination Therapy Improves Survival in Advanced Melanoma PatientsMelanomapreclinicalThe 4-year progression-free survival rate was 30.6% for nivolumab plus relatlimab versus 23.6% for nivolumab alone.Source →
Combination Therapy Shows Promise for Metastatic Uveal MelanomaMelanomaobservational—Source →
Nivolumab Fails to Improve Remission in Acute Myeloid LeukemiaLeukemiaphase-2The median progression-free survival was 13.2 months in the Nivo arm and 10.9 months in the Obs arm.Source →
Color Vision Loss in Melanoma Patient Treated with Nivolumab-RelatlimabMelanomaobservational—Source →
Nivolumab Treatment in Melanoma Patients: Immune and Nutritional Status Linked to SurvivalMelanomaobservationalPatients with high HALP scores had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS: median 5.8 vs 3.1 months) and overall survival (OS: median 54.9 vs 14.4 months) compared to those with low HALP scores.Source →
Combining Telaglenastat and Nivolumab in Cancer TreatmentMelanomaphase-1/2The overall response rate was 8.4% in the response-assessable analysis set.Source →
Rare Side Effects of Cancer TreatmentMelanomaobservational—Source →
Nivolumab Effectiveness in Non-Small Cell Lung CancerLung CancerobservationalThe 36-month OS rate was 19.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5-22.0); the 12-month investigator-assessed best ORR in the overall population was 20.4%.Source →
Rare Side Effect of Cancer TreatmentMelanomaobservational—Source →
Inflammatory Markers and Metastases Predict Nivolumab Response in Lung CancerLung CancerobservationalThe median overall survival was 21.2 months (95% CI: 17.4-25.0).Source →
Brazilian Study Examines Cost of New Melanoma TreatmentsMelanomaobservational—Source →
Researchers Test New Cancer Treatment in Rare Ovarian CancersOvarian Cancerphase-2The overall response rate was 25% in granulosa cell tumors, with 50% of patients experiencing clinical benefit.Source →
Combination Therapy for Lung Cancer: A Meta-AnalysisLung Cancermeta-analysisNon-small cell lung cancer patients who received combination therapy had better progression-free survival (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.71; 0.93, P < 0.01).Source →
Relatlimab/Nivolumab Combination Therapy for Advanced MelanomaMelanomareview—Source →
Combining Entinostat and Nivolumab in Pancreatic CancerPancreatic Cancerphase-2The objective response rate was 11% (95% CI, 2.4%-29.2%) with a median response duration of 10.2 months.Source →
Long-term Outcomes for Melanoma Patients Treated with Nivolumab and IpilimumabMelanomaphase-3OS was longer with NIVO + IPI versus NIVO monotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.91]), with 6-year OS rates of 52% versus 41%, respectively.Source →
Melanoma patients' quality of life during immunotherapy treatmentMelanomaobservational—Source →
Melanoma Patients' Long-Term Survival Rates After TreatmentMelanomaphase-3Estimated cure rates were 48.3% with nivolumab, 38.2% with ipilimumab, and 29.2% with placebo.Source →
Long-term Outcomes with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced MelanomaMelanomaphase-3Median overall survival was 71.9 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 36.9 months with nivolumab, and 19.9 months with ipilimumab.Source →
Study Compares Cancer Treatments for Rare Melanoma in Japanese PatientsMelanomaobservationalObjective response rates did not differ significantly between the NIVO+IPI and PD-1 groups (40.0% vs 27.7%).Source →
Researchers Study Effectiveness of Cancer Treatment with Adaptive DosingMelanomaphase-2The overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 35%-59%) with a median follow-up of 34 months among survivors.Source →
Melanoma Treatment Comparison Study Finds Similar EfficacyMelanomaphase-3Nivolumab plus relatlimab demonstrated similar progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.33]) and overall survival (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.19]) to nivolumab plus ipilimumab.Source →
Combination Therapy Shows Promise in Lung Cancer TreatmentLung Cancerphase-2The estimated mean 6-month progression-free survival rate was 68.9% (high-MET group) and 50.9% (low-MET group).Source →
Woman's Rare Brain Inflammation Linked to Cancer TreatmentLung Cancerobservational—Source →
Nivolumab Monotherapy and Salvage Immunotherapy in Advanced Kidney CancerMelanomaphase-2The 36-month mean time on protocol therapy was 11.5 months, and the 36-month mean TFS for the whole population was 9.4 months.Source →
Nivolumab Shows Promise in Treating Rare CancerLung CancerobservationalThe response rate was 8%, disease control rate was 37%, median progression-free survival was 5.7 months, and median overall survival was 11.1 months.Source →
New Insights into Cancer Treatment for ChildrenMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Nivolumab treatment helps patient with advanced melanoma and liver failureMelanomaobservational—Source →
Combining Vaccine and Immunotherapy in Early Prostate CancerProstate Cancerphase-221% of patients had a PSA decline >50%.Source →
Nivolumab Not Cost-Effective for Relapsed Mesothelioma in ChinaLung Cancerphase-3Patients receiving nivolumab gained 0.65 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared to 0.43 QALYs for those receiving a placebo.Source →
Combining Nivolumab and Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer TreatmentLung Cancerphase-3Median OS was 18.8 months with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus 15.6 months with chemotherapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.Source →
Immunotherapy Shows Promise for Advanced Colorectal CancerColorectal Cancerphase-2—Source →
New Lung Cancer Treatment Combination Shows Mixed ResultsLung Cancerphase-3The clinical benefit rate was 75.5% for sitra + nivo and 64.5% for docetaxel.Source →
Combination Therapy Shows Promise for Advanced MelanomaMelanomaobservational—Source →
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors May Reduce Costs of Cancer TreatmentLung Cancerphase-3—Source →
Combining Cancer Treatments May Help Some Patients with Advanced MelanomaMelanomaphase-2The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival over ipilimumab (hazard ratio = 0.63).Source →
Japanese Study Finds Safety of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Combination Therapy for MelanomaMelanomaobservational—Source →
Combining Immunotherapy Treatments Shows Promise in Pancreatic CancerPancreatic Cancerphase-2Treatment with GVAX+nivolumab+urelumab meets the primary endpoint by significantly increasing intratumoral CD8+ CD137+ cells (p = 0.003) compared to GVAX+Nivolumab.Source →
Relatlimab-Nivolumab Combination for Metastatic MelanomaMelanomareview—Source →
Combining two drugs may help some patients with rare cancer complicationLeukemiaphase-2The overall response rate was 42%.Source →
Combination Immunotherapy for Melanoma Brain MetastasesMelanomaobservationalMedian overall survival was 5.45 months, with 21% of patients alive after 3 years.Source →
Nivolumab Plus Relatlimab Shows Promise in Treating Advanced MelanomaMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Melanoma Treatment Costs and Use Vary by Therapy TypeMelanomaobservational—Source →
Combining Nivolumab and Relatlimab to Treat MelanomaMelanomaphase-3Nivolumab and relatlimab produced more than a 2-fold median increase in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to nivolumab monotherapy.Source →
Predicting Nivolumab Efficacy in Lung Cancer PatientsLung CancerobservationalThe objective response and disease control rates at 25 weeks were 18.5 and 41.2%, respectively.Source →
Combination Therapy Shows Promise in Treating Advanced MelanomaMelanomaphase-3The estimated 5-year RFS and OS rates for the neoadjuvant arm were 70% and 90% versus 60% and 70% for the adjuvant arm.Source →
Sema4D silencing may improve melanoma treatment with nivolumabMelanomalab-study—Source →
IMDC Risk Score Predicts Nivolumab Effectiveness in Renal Cancer and MelanomaMelanomaobservational—Source →
Nivolumab Tested in Rare CancerLung Cancerphase-2—Source →
Combining Immunotherapy for Melanoma TreatmentMelanomaphase-2—Source →
Nivolumab Levels Linked to Melanoma Treatment OutcomesMelanomaobservational—Source →
Combination Immunotherapy Shows Promise in Treating MelanomaMelanomaphase-2The pathologic complete response rate was 57%.Source →
New Treatment Option for Advanced Melanoma PatientsMelanomaphase-1/2Nivolumab/relatlimab demonstrated a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.1 months.Source →
Melanoma Treatment Comparison StudyMelanomaphase-3The 2-year overall survival for those starting on arm A was 71.8% (95% CI, 62.5 to 79.1), and arm B 51.5% (95% CI, 41.7 to 60.4).Source →
Combination Therapy Does Not Improve Survival in Melanoma PatientsMelanomaphase-324-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab).Source →
Combination Therapy Fails to Improve Lung Cancer TreatmentLung Cancerphase-2The objective response rate was 3.2%.Source →
Side Effects of Cancer Treatment: A Rare Case of ColitisMelanomaobservational—Source →
Rare Skin Reaction in Child with Cancer Treated with NivolumabMelanomaobservational—Source →
Real-world safety of nivolumab in melanoma patientsMelanomaobservational—Source →
Nivolumab Retreatment in Lung Cancer PatientsLung Cancerphase-2Nivolumab retreatment demonstrated an overall response rate of 8.5% and median progression-free survival of 2.6 months.Source →
Long-term benefit of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancerphase-2The investigator-assessed objective response rate increased from 55% to 65% at 50.9 months.Source →
Rare Skin Cancer Linked to Melanoma TreatmentMelanomaobservational—Source →
Combining Immunotherapy and Radiation for Pancreatic CancerPancreatic Cancerphase-2The clinical benefit rate was 17.1% for patients receiving nivolumab and radiation, and 37.2% for patients receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab with radiation.Source →
New Study Compares Melanoma Treatment with Two Immunotherapy DrugsMelanomaphase-3—Source →
Neutrophils May Help Predict Melanoma Treatment OutcomesMelanomalab-studyPatients with lower PD-L1 PMN frequencies displayed better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to patients with high PD-L1 PMN frequencies.Source →
Nivolumab Monotherapy for Advanced Lung Cancer in Asian PatientsLung Cancerphase-3Median overall survival was 14.7 months, and median progression-free survival was 3.6 months.Source →
Nivolumab treatment in patients with kidney failureMelanomaobservational—Source →
Long-term Outcomes of Melanoma Treatment with Nivolumab and IpilimumabMelanomaphase-3Median overall survival was 72.1, 36.9, and 19.9 months in the combination, nivolumab, and ipilimumab groups, respectively.Source →
Rare Side Effects of Cancer Treatment Cause Oral Ulcers and Adrenal InsufficiencyLung Cancerobservational—Source →
Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Show Promise in Rare Aggressive Breast CancerBreast Cancerphase-2The overall response rate was 18%.Source →
Nivolumab Dose Escalation Triggers Rare Side Effect in Lung Cancer PatientLung Cancerobservational—Source →
Reusing Cancer Treatment May Not Work as Well Second Time AroundMelanomaobservationalThe best overall response rate was 74% after the first course of ipilimumab/nivolumab, but only 23% after reinduction.Source →
Rucaparib and Nivolumab Tested as Maintenance Treatment for Ovarian CancerOvarian Cancerphase-3—Source →
Gastric Cancer Study Finds Tumor Mutation Burden and Indel Rate Linked to Treatment OutcomesLeukemiaphase-2Patients with TMB ≥ 18.03/Mb and an indel rate of > 40% had a hazard ratio of 0.07 for progression-free survival and 0.09 for overall survival.Source →
New Treatment Option for Advanced Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-3Overall survival was improved for patients who received nivolumab and ipilimumab, with a median OS of 18.1 months compared with 14.1 months for patients who received chemotherapy.Source →
Nivolumab Safety in Stage III/IV Melanoma PatientsMelanomaphase-3—Source →
Rare Mediastinal Melanoma Shrinks with ImmunotherapyMelanomaphase-2nivolumab monotherapy caused remarkable tumor shrinkageSource →
New Tool Helps Doctors Decide Next Steps for Lung Cancer PatientsLung Cancerlab-study—Source →
Rare Skin Reaction Linked to Cancer TreatmentMelanomaobservational—Source →
Nivolumab treatment for HIV-infected lung cancer patientsLung Cancerphase-2The disease control rate was 62.5% for 15 evaluable patients at 8 weeks.Source →
Rare Esophageal Cancer Treated with NivolumabMelanomaobservational—Source →
Weight Loss Linked to Poor Prognosis in Lung Cancer PatientsLung CancerobservationalLoss of body weight of >2% at week 6 was an independent predictor for poor OS (hazard ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval 1.51-3.79, P < 0.001)Source →
Rare Lymphoma Linked to Cancer TreatmentLung Cancerobservational—Source →
Lung Cancer Study Finds New Way to Predict Treatment SuccessLung CancerobservationalMedian progression-free survival for subjects with NLR <3 before treatment was 18.5 weeks, while in subjects with NLR ≥3 was 14 weeks.Source →
Nivolumab Fails to Improve Survival in Relapsed Small-Cell Lung CancerLung Cancerphase-3Median progression-free survival was 1.4 versus 3.8 months (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.69).Source →
Rare Side Effects of Cancer TreatmentMelanomaobservational—Source →
Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in treating small cell lung cancerLung Cancerphase-3Mean overall survival was 21.69 months with nivolumab and 5.80 months with IV or oral topotecan.Source →
Large Spleen May Predict Poor Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer TreatmentPancreatic CancerobservationalAmong 31 evaluable patients, the response and disease control rates were 7% and 36%, respectively.Source →
Gene Expression May Predict Response to Cancer TreatmentLung Cancerlab-study—Source →
Testing for Cancer Gene May Improve Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Treatment in ChinaLung Cancerphase-3The PD-L1 test-based strategy yielded an additional 0.27 QALYs compared to the docetaxel strategy without a PD-L1 test.Source →
Combining Cancer Drugs with Anti-Inflammatory Medications in Melanoma PatientsMelanomapreclinicalSeven of seven evaluable patients achieved objective response, including four complete responses and three partial responses, in the certolizumab cohort.Source →

This information is provided for general education only and is not medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.